May 12, 2010 10:51:00 AM
Columbus leaders have backed off plans to implement an ethics code for elected officials, deciding state law already governs ethics in office.
Following a physical altercation, at City Hall, between Columbus Mayor Robert Smith and Ward 5 Councilman Kabir Karriem, Ward 3 Councilman Charlie Box April 6 submitted a proposed code of ethics for consideration.
Box''s code was submitted as a voluntary measure for elected officials and city boards, Box said, noting his submission contained provisions for board members and elected officials to treat their fellow board members and office holders with respect.
"The whole thing was about civility and dignity," Box said.
But City Attorney Jeff Turnage Tuesday informed the council the substance of Box''s code of ethics is contained in code already adopted by the state and municipality.
"The state already has code sections on the Ethics in Government law," Turnage said Friday. "The Ethics in Government laws are very comprehensive in scope and there are hundreds of opinions from the Ethics Commission and the courts."
For example, state nepotism law prohibits the hiring, in a broad range of jobs, of a person "within the third degree of kinship of the official," and statutory procedures exist stipulating how an elected official may be removed from office, he noted.
"The proposed ethics code presented to me for review and comment came from a town out in California," he said of Box''s proposed code. "The proposed code had some very similar provisions to our state ethics code, but the language was not quite the same. So, based upon the fact that we already had comprehensive state code provisions on much of what was in the proposed code, I didn''t feel the city needed to enact something else which may have caused confusion."
Box Tuesday said he''s satisfied with Turnage''s recommendation to stick with the state''s stronger existing codes and noted he does not plan to submit any further codes of ethics for consideration.
Modeled after a section of the state Constitution prohibiting public officials from having material financial interests in contracts with levels of government on which the officials serve, the Ethics in Government law, passed by the state Legislature, is comprehensive.
Provisions for removal of office include stipulations the office of any public officer convicted of a felony shall be declared vacant and if any public officer is found guilty of a felony or crime punishable by a year or more of imprisonment the state attorney general shall "promptly enter a motion for removal from office" of the official.
County officials can only be removed by the governor, but first the governor must receive a petition, signed by no less than 30 percent of the qualified electors of the county, and containing a general statement of the grounds upon which removal is demanded.
Petitions for the removal of county supervisors, justice court judges and constables must be signed by at least 51 percent of the qualified electors of the beat or district from which the offending officer originally was elected.
The state nepotism statute prohibits the hiring of "any person related by blood or marriage within the third degree" to an elected or appointed official, in five different job types -- officer, clerk, stenographer, deputy and assistant.
But the statute does contain a grandfather clause, allowing for relatives hired before the related official took office, or was appointed, to remain.
The Ethics in Government nepotism statute prohibits the hiring of dependent family members -- spouses, children or parents -- in any position and does not include a grandfather provision.
Michael commented at 5/12/2010 1:19:00 PM:
Since we did have a State Ethics Code, why does it not apply to Columbus?
TD commented at 5/12/2010 1:55:00 PM:
Ahhhhha. So the state statute stipluates that if an elected official commits a felony, he can be removed. But since both sides dropped charges against each other - then there is no crime and hence no punishment. That's slick.
In the meantime, we still have a mayor and a councilman that have utter disregard for the city of Columbus, its laws, and its law abiding citizens. Smith and Karriem consider themselves rulers and above the law - rather than honorable public servants who set the example.
stephen commented at 5/12/2010 5:08:00 PM:
You did what? Try something else because it didn't work and help you get any votes. Just a loser now and in the future when you put your name on a ballot.
Kat commented at 5/12/2010 6:03:00 PM:
VOTE THEM OUT OF OFFICE ...that is how you handle the problem. They BOTH need to GO. The entire incident was a huge black eye for Columbus. Wake up voters- do you job !
Thom Geiger commented at 5/12/2010 8:39:00 PM:
'Stephen', how do you track the pseudonyms you use? A spreadsheet, the phone book or do you just wing it every time you log on to a site?
You know, I've been after you for over four years for you to finally get the nerve up to spit it out, whatever the real problem is that you have with me, but you still don't have what it takes.
First you went ballistic when you found out I was from Palmer Home and running for public office. Oh my, how dare some raggedy commoner have the audacity. Then when I started exposing the drunken parties on city school property, you really came unglued. Something about a sweetheart at the school central office.
Gee, after all that, do you really think what you posted was any kind of rebuttal to what I wrote, or just more personal animosity towards me? Hhhmmmm, I wonder.
Nowe, do you have anything at all to contradict what I posted about a code of conduct for city officials? Something? Anything? Take your time. I'll wait...
Snappy commented at 5/12/2010 11:21:00 PM:
So who enforces the state code of ethics and where are they? If there is no enforcement, why have the code? It ultimately comes down to the voters who unfortunately vote with no sense of responsibility.
Tj commented at 5/13/2010 2:20:00 AM:
Where has the State Ethics Commission been thru all of this? If the Mayor and a City councilman get in a fist fight, that has ethics violation written all over it! They should have stepped down from office and let much more responsible people take their position and the people of Columbus should have demanded it! Please voters VOTE THEM OUT OF OFFICE since nothing else can be done to them apparently.
TD commented at 5/13/2010 9:49:00 AM:
I agree with you TJ, the state ethics commission should have been on this like green on grass. But since both "rulers" agreed to drop charges those bozos in Jackson probably feel there is nothing to investigate.
2. The eerie case of Manuel Vasquez COLUMBUS & LOWNDES COUNTY
3. Charges expected to be filed Monday COLUMBUS & LOWNDES COUNTY
4. CMSD deals with teacher turnover COLUMBUS & LOWNDES COUNTY
5. Wife, mother-in-law of missing New Hope man charged with murder COLUMBUS & LOWNDES COUNTY