Article Comment 

Charging ahead

 

 

It is disappointing, though not surprising that the Lowndes Supervisors are charging ahead with the Burns Bottom site for a soccer complex. At their Monday meeting, the supervisors announced plans to begin acquiring options to purchase land for that purpose. Joe Higgins of the Link has been activated for the task. 

 


Never mind that the area floods regularly (four times in the past six months). 

 


Never mind that development of the site will require extensive wetlands. mitigation. 

 


Never mind that the siting of sports fields adjacent to a historic downtown inhibits chances of further growth in that direction and is a spectacularly bad example of city planning. 

 


Never mind that there is a Main Street Mississippi planning charrette scheduled for September that would provide valuable insight and guidance for public land use such as this. 

 


What arrogance. While Monday''s actions could be seen as preliminary, to our knowledge, no final decision, by the city or the county, has been made on the location. Moving toward acquiring the land skews that decision in favor of Burns Bottom. 

 


Despite the actions of our supervisors Monday, we urge all of our city and county leaders to give due and fair considerations to all the sites presented, talk to their constituents, and make a reasoned decision. 

 


No one questions the need for a soccer complex for the children of Lowndes County. In fact, we as a community have been affirming this need for longer than we can remember.  

 


All of a sudden, it has to be done now. 

 


Originally 11 sites were submitted for consideration. While some of the land was prohibitively expensive, we''ve not sure exactly how or why these 71 acres, many of which are low-lying wetlands, made the cut.  

 


Certain elected officials have supported this choice from the get-to. Could that be it? Could this be a case of the tail wagging the dog? Surely not. 

 


The publisher of this paper has been criticized for not being supportive, for using scare tactics in a past column. But it is the newspaper''s responsibility to point out foolishness such as this. Soccer fields in the flood plain. Soccer fields a stone''s throw from a historic downtown. Seems like that''s all one would have to say. 

 


Many have expressed disappointment, even disbelief at the choice. Count us among that group. 

 


But not our supervisors. Damn the torpedoes and public opinion, full speed ahead.

 

 

printer friendly version | back to top

 

Reader Comments

Article Comment Renee commented at 7/18/2009 9:43:00 PM:

In the segment "Charging Ahead" the writer questions the selection of land for the soccer complex and how did the wetlands get picked above all other sites. That is easily answered, some may be in denial but we all know why. The big question that is on my mind is why does Columbus need a soccer complex? I do not see a plethora of people running to play soccer all the time. Is that really the biggest sport played here in Columbus, or is it the preferred sport of the majority dwelling here in Columbus? Is the complex really going to be just for soccer or will all sports be accommodated?

 

back to top

 

 

Most Viewed Opinion Stories

 

1. Our View: And the winner is ... Poindexter Hall DISPATCH EDITORIALS

2. Voice of the people: Martin Pomphrey, Jr. M.D. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR (VOICE@CDISPATCH.COM)

3. Voice of the people: Marjorie (Margie) Canon LETTERS TO THE EDITOR (VOICE@CDISPATCH.COM)

4. America's liberal tradition NATIONAL COLUMNS

5. Voice of the people: Kelsey Van Every LETTERS TO THE EDITOR (VOICE@CDISPATCH.COM)

 

More popular content      Suggest a story

 

 

Follow Us:

Follow Us on Facebook

Follow Us on Twitter

Follow Us via Instagram

Follow Us via Email