February 3, 2010 9:48:00 AM
In Mein Kamp Hitler demonstrated that he understood the power of the "big lie." Being more genteel than he, I prefer to call the repetitions, distortions, denials and ad hominem attacks on MUW alumnae who oppose the name change - myths. In the interest of accuracy in journalism, I want to bust a few of those myths.
The blue haired termagants myth: A single, solitary Blue haired W alum may exist somewhere in the state of Mississippi, but I have attended alumni events for years and never caught sight of one. I challenge all you name callers out there to either produce a live blue-haired W alum or drop the phrase from your diatribes.
The shrill myth: Media types seem fixated on using the adjective shrill to describe W alums who disagree with them. Sheer myth. I studied "speech correction" at the W and I taught a course in Voice and Articulation for 40 years. My ears are trained to identify pitch problems. I challenge you to establish a quantifiable standard for measuring shrillness and name the offenders you have personally heard screeching. The W alums I know have rather pleasant, cultured and resonant voices.
The small group myth: Your fallacy here lies in the assumption that we are a small group. Do you really believe that a small group of shrill, blue-haired shrews could counter the combined weight of the Link, EMC, and IHL and get an entire Senate committee "in our clutches." Surely you know that the legislative game is a numbers game and the "long blue line" is obviously a whole lot longer than you believe it to be. Is it so hard to believe that legislators actually assessed the issue and arrived at a different conclusion from yours?
The it''s all about emotion myth: If you read and analyze the statements Betty Lou Jones, David Ivey, and Ann Lamarr Franklin prepared for the Senate Hearing committee, you have to be delusional to characterize the content as emotional. Their statements were replete with citations affirming the value of women''s studies and colleges focused on the education of women. In contrast proponents of name change offer no empirical date to support their position and ignore the failure of the Randolph Macon example. This is actually the biggest myth of all. The distinction between the use of pathos and logos is very real; the former relies on emotion - the latter on reasoning and evidence. In the current debate it is the name change proponents who have failed to carry the burden of proof and have relied instead on circular reasoning, essentially asserting that "the name should be changed because it needs to be changed."
The myth of alums clinging to the past: Nothing could be more sexist than arguing that the time/need for educating women for leadership and employment is a thing of the past. 125 years ago the W became the first state supported institution of higher education devoted to doing just that. In a state rife with domestic violence, teen pregnancies, un and under-employment, where women are paid 25 percent less than men for doing the same work as men - MUW''s women''s mission is more rather than less viable today. Clinging to our alma mater''s mission is a very very different thing from clinging to the past.
You missed a great editorial opportunity today. Instead of coming on as a poor loser and attacking legislators and alums alike, you could have taken this as an opportunity to provide constructive leadership for the community and to promote pride and unity in support of MUW for what it is and what it has to offer.
Fortunately it''s not too late for you and The Dispatch to be real cheerleaders for The W.
Jimmie Meese Moomaw, MUW, Class of ''58, Avondale Estates, Ga.
zzzzzzzzzzzz commented at 2/3/2010 11:22:00 AM:
I am a W alum. Once upon a time, this was an interesting story. Now, it's just boring.
You've gotten the responses from the public; feel free to continue ignoring them. The writing is on the wall, as far as the future of the university is concerned. It's just a matter of time now.
The university is faltering and budget cuts won't do anything to enhance the situation. It's pretty clear that no one has any interest in compromise, which is what the situation calls for at this point. So just keep bickering, calling each other names, conducting yourselves in the whiny (both sides) and undignified manner to which the rest of us have grown accustomed, and we'll just wait quietly while it all folds up. At least then we won't have this endless mess in our faces and in our ears all the time. No university, either, but that seems to be beside the point.
Wake Up commented at 2/3/2010 1:50:00 PM:
Yes, "zzzzzzzzzzzz", and it's the apathetic ones like you who have REALLY helped. *snort* Got better ideas? Then jump on in with the rest of the people who have been working their kiesters off and do something about it.
MUW 86 commented at 2/3/2010 2:40:00 PM:
Me thinks that thou hast strained at a gnat and swallowed a camel (a fatal one, at that).
I have the utmost repect for my fellow alums, but many lack real world exposure and the knowledge of competitive marketing principles. The name may not be changed, but you will soon no longer have the W. Hollow victory thine. You and those who believe as you do have defeated the only idea (rebranding the university)that could possibly have saved "our heritage".
Going Out on a Limbert commented at 2/3/2010 3:06:00 PM:
"Once upon a time, this was an interesting story."
zzzzzzzzzzz commented at 2/3/2010 11:34:00 PM:
I am sorry if I gave the impression I have been apathetic about this. I have not. I have given my input in a number of directions. However, being a busy person, I only have a limited number of hours available to devote to beating a dead horse, and unfortunately, those hours have all been used.
zzzzzzzzzzz commented at 2/3/2010 11:39:00 PM:
Forgot this: regarding the request for "better ideas"...the trouble is neither side wants better ideas. You are all only interested in finding more people who will regurgitate the same tired ideas already expressed. Is it not perfectly clear that there is now a stalemate, and there will be no moving forward without both sides being willing to yield on a few key points.
When reports start coming in that true compromise is being sought, you may invite my interest again.
I received a very fine education from MUW. I appreciate that. It's a shame that we'll all be singing "Precious Memories" together, united at last as alums of a closed institution.
Bubba Gump commented at 2/4/2010 8:21:00 AM:
Hey MooMoo, BORING!!!! Tired old boring logic. Tired old diatribe. Women are so misunderstood. Bad ole men holding women down. If only we had a school where we could accept the money of men, but exclude them from the actual college environment. You know, add a catchy slogan like "It's all about us girls, and them smart boys too."
Looking forward to the death of the W, and maybe, just maybe, something that represents the "equality" you claim to seek rising from its ashes.
You ole Blue Haired Mafia you.
marv commented at 2/5/2010 9:00:00 AM:
IF YOU HAVE A DYING BUSINESS A NAME CHANGE WILL NOT HELP. WHERE IS ALL THE BRAIN POWER WITH THE RIGHT ANSWERS. START WITH THE "HEAD" AND WORK DOWN!
affiliate commented at 2/16/2010 7:16:00 AM:
http://www.discountinchina.com discount in china
1. Our View: And the winner is ... Poindexter Hall DISPATCH EDITORIALS
2. Voice of the people: Marjorie (Margie) Canon LETTERS TO THE EDITOR (VOICE@CDISPATCH.COM)
3. America's liberal tradition NATIONAL COLUMNS
4. Voice of the people: Kelsey Van Every LETTERS TO THE EDITOR (VOICE@CDISPATCH.COM)
5. Voice of the people: Martin Pomphrey, Jr. M.D. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR (VOICE@CDISPATCH.COM)