February 18, 2010 9:29:00 AM
I am saddened to read some of the online posts in response to the article in the Dispatch today about the open forum in Starkville. I appreciate the school board and Mrs. Couey for holding it, Mr. Buffington for moderating and everyone for attending. The forum was to allow the airing of opinions on the proposed uniform policy. I was hoping it would initiate a two-way dialogue and help the disagreement become more civil and more productive. There are a lot of assumptions made about the motives of the people against the uniforms and the motives of the school board. I can''t speak to anyone''s motives or experiences other than mine so I won''t.
The overwhelming concern by most of us against uniforms is that our MS education budget has shrunk by about $170 million this year (this includes the $37 million our representatives voted to restore to the budget today) Uniforms for those who can''t afford them are going to be a major cost to a district that has real problems. We want to see this money put towards those problems -drop out rates, failing test scores, safety concerns, etc. Without a fiscal analysis of what a uniform policy will cost and a firm commitment from non-profits/donors to cover the cost, we are concerned about what this will mean to the SSD budget and where the money for uniforms will come from. Without clear benefits to changing the status quo, how can we justify the cost?
In response to a couple of comments about not being involved, if this issue is what it took to wake people up and get them to realize we have big problems then that is great. I had no idea of the extent of our problems until this subject came up. As I said in my last letter I was asleep at the wheel. I have lots of reasons why-work, kids, illness, caring for sick relatives out-of-state, etc. but the fact is I wasn''t paying attention beyond being room mom or going on fieldtrips. The school board is there to keep an eye out and I appreciate their service to the district. I think they want the best for our children and our schools. However, we all have different ideas about how to achieve that. We have to work together on this and this entails a two-way dialogue. My hope is that it is respectful. Unfortunately passions run high sometimes and well-intentioned but sometimes misguided or inappropriate remarks and assumptions are made.
It seems that this is as good a time as any to model for our kids how to disagree respectfully.
I hope this whole ordeal strengthens our resolve to do better for our children as parents, educators, school board members and as a community. By this I mean better and more communication between the board and the community, respectful discourse and a full-on commitment to work together to help our schools and our children reach their potential.
Jennifer K. L. Burgess, Starkville
Columbus Teacher commented at 2/18/2010 12:10:00 PM:
Why would the school district be responsible for buying uniforms for those who can't afford them? Do those students go to school naked?
Surely Starkville has agencies that can help and in no way should this be a financial burden on the school system.
Tax payer commented at 3/3/2010 8:48:00 AM:
The district has to pay for required uniforms for any family that meats the poverty requirments. It is the Law. Those same agencies should be spending their shrinking funds in areas of real need, like feeding the starving, providing heat to the eldery not buying school uniforms.
and besides what can a district do to inforce the uniform? they can not put a child out of the classroom that again would be against the Law. Children can not control what their parents give them to whare to school.
1. Our View: Bill Minor: A light in dark places DISPATCH EDITORIALS
2. Our View: 'Tales from the Crypt' far more than entertainment DISPATCH EDITORIALS
3. Voice of the people: George Hazard LETTERS TO THE EDITOR (VOICE@CDISPATCH.COM)
4. Steve Chapman: Opioid deaths: another drug-war failure NATIONAL COLUMNS
5. Patrick Buchanan: The continuing decline of Congress NATIONAL COLUMNS